<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Garmin Forerunner 205/305 vs 405 Initial Compare Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reviewsonvideo.net/digitalreviews/compare-reviews/garmin-forerunner-205305-vs-405-initial-compare-review/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reviewsonvideo.net/digitalreviews/compare-reviews/garmin-forerunner-205305-vs-405-initial-compare-review</link>
	<description>Information on Hot Niche Products</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:37:59 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: robertmartinez</title>
		<link>http://www.reviewsonvideo.net/digitalreviews/compare-reviews/garmin-forerunner-205305-vs-405-initial-compare-review/comment-page-1#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>robertmartinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reviewsonvideo.net/digitalreviews/compare-reviews/garmin-forerunner-205305-vs-405-initial-compare-review#comment-28</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Where did you find ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; Where did you find information that the 405 was having problems ????????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Where did you find &#8230;</b> <br /> Where did you find information that the 405 was having problems ????????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robertmartinez</title>
		<link>http://www.reviewsonvideo.net/digitalreviews/compare-reviews/garmin-forerunner-205305-vs-405-initial-compare-review/comment-page-1#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>robertmartinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reviewsonvideo.net/digitalreviews/compare-reviews/garmin-forerunner-205305-vs-405-initial-compare-review#comment-29</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Actually, a friend ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; Actually, a friend of mine had the 205 and we compared his to my 305. They were NOT the same model at least as far as screen size went. He later purchased the 305.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Actually, a friend &#8230;</b> <br /> Actually, a friend of mine had the 205 and we compared his to my 305. They were NOT the same model at least as far as screen size went. He later purchased the 305.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeThe360</title>
		<link>http://www.reviewsonvideo.net/digitalreviews/compare-reviews/garmin-forerunner-205305-vs-405-initial-compare-review/comment-page-1#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeThe360</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reviewsonvideo.net/digitalreviews/compare-reviews/garmin-forerunner-205305-vs-405-initial-compare-review#comment-30</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;So what you&#039;re ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; So what you&#039;re saying is that the 205 is the same thing as the 305 but the 205 is blue and it does not have the heart rate moniter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>So what you&#8217;re &#8230;</b> <br /> So what you&#8217;re saying is that the 205 is the same thing as the 305 but the 205 is blue and it does not have the heart rate moniter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whitehill0004</title>
		<link>http://www.reviewsonvideo.net/digitalreviews/compare-reviews/garmin-forerunner-205305-vs-405-initial-compare-review/comment-page-1#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>whitehill0004</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reviewsonvideo.net/digitalreviews/compare-reviews/garmin-forerunner-205305-vs-405-initial-compare-review#comment-31</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;I agree with rich. ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; I agree with rich. Another thing mentioned that is incorrect is that the 205/305 data fields don&#039;t scroll - you can select autoscroll in the options.
Additionally, accuracy for the 405 has been called into question. Keep that in mind.
A for effort, C- for information dissemination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I agree with rich. &#8230;</b> <br /> I agree with rich. Another thing mentioned that is incorrect is that the 205/305 data fields don&#8217;t scroll &#8211; you can select autoscroll in the options.<br />
Additionally, accuracy for the 405 has been called into question. Keep that in mind.<br />
A for effort, C- for information dissemination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richandfamily</title>
		<link>http://www.reviewsonvideo.net/digitalreviews/compare-reviews/garmin-forerunner-205305-vs-405-initial-compare-review/comment-page-1#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>richandfamily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reviewsonvideo.net/digitalreviews/compare-reviews/garmin-forerunner-205305-vs-405-initial-compare-review#comment-32</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Please note:  This ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; Please note:  This reviewer doesn&#039;t even know the models he&#039;s talking about.  The 405 is correct, but his 305 is really a 205 (but as he said, it&#039;s a 305 without a Heart rate monitor).  None of these models are the same as the 301, which is an even older model with a bigger design, worse heart rate monitor, and which doesn&#039;t have as strong of a GPS receiver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Please note:  This &#8230;</b> <br /> Please note:  This reviewer doesn&#8217;t even know the models he&#8217;s talking about.  The 405 is correct, but his 305 is really a 205 (but as he said, it&#8217;s a 305 without a Heart rate monitor).  None of these models are the same as the 301, which is an even older model with a bigger design, worse heart rate monitor, and which doesn&#8217;t have as strong of a GPS receiver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neddyt</title>
		<link>http://www.reviewsonvideo.net/digitalreviews/compare-reviews/garmin-forerunner-205305-vs-405-initial-compare-review/comment-page-1#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>neddyt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reviewsonvideo.net/digitalreviews/compare-reviews/garmin-forerunner-205305-vs-405-initial-compare-review#comment-33</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Yeah, I would love ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; Yeah, I would love to see a price drop in the 405.
The 305 has the functions I want, but I dont think id wear it when i wasnt running.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Yeah, I would love &#8230;</b> <br /> Yeah, I would love to see a price drop in the 405.<br />
The 305 has the functions I want, but I dont think id wear it when i wasnt running.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thecyr</title>
		<link>http://www.reviewsonvideo.net/digitalreviews/compare-reviews/garmin-forerunner-205305-vs-405-initial-compare-review/comment-page-1#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>thecyr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reviewsonvideo.net/digitalreviews/compare-reviews/garmin-forerunner-205305-vs-405-initial-compare-review#comment-34</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;the 405 cx and 310 ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; the 405 cx and 310 xt are out, haven&#039;t read too much into them yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>the 405 cx and 310 &#8230;</b> <br /> the 405 cx and 310 xt are out, haven&#8217;t read too much into them yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neddyt</title>
		<link>http://www.reviewsonvideo.net/digitalreviews/compare-reviews/garmin-forerunner-205305-vs-405-initial-compare-review/comment-page-1#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>neddyt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reviewsonvideo.net/digitalreviews/compare-reviews/garmin-forerunner-205305-vs-405-initial-compare-review#comment-35</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;any idea when the ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; any idea when the next forerunner will be released?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>any idea when the &#8230;</b> <br /> any idea when the next forerunner will be released?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: magdalenrivetgjf</title>
		<link>http://www.reviewsonvideo.net/digitalreviews/compare-reviews/garmin-forerunner-205305-vs-405-initial-compare-review/comment-page-1#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>magdalenrivetgjf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reviewsonvideo.net/digitalreviews/compare-reviews/garmin-forerunner-205305-vs-405-initial-compare-review#comment-36</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Nice work. keep it ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; Nice work. keep it up. mean time come for social media marketing for esteembpo**com   GHF</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Nice work. keep it &#8230;</b> <br /> Nice work. keep it up. mean time come for social media marketing for esteembpo**com   GHF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: otivaeey</title>
		<link>http://www.reviewsonvideo.net/digitalreviews/compare-reviews/garmin-forerunner-205305-vs-405-initial-compare-review/comment-page-1#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>otivaeey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reviewsonvideo.net/digitalreviews/compare-reviews/garmin-forerunner-205305-vs-405-initial-compare-review#comment-37</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;my suunto x10 can ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; my suunto x10 can last for 2 month or up w/out gps on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>my suunto x10 can &#8230;</b> <br /> my suunto x10 can last for 2 month or up w/out gps on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
