<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YOUR MEETING FOR  STATUS CHANGE HEY ARE GOING TO  REVIEW THE DIGITAL FILE?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reviewsonvideo.net/digitalreviews/digital-review/your-meeting-for-status-change-hey-are-going-to-review-the-digital-file/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reviewsonvideo.net/digitalreviews/digital-review/your-meeting-for-status-change-hey-are-going-to-review-the-digital-file</link>
	<description>Information on Hot Niche Products</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:37:59 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: musicseawater</title>
		<link>http://www.reviewsonvideo.net/digitalreviews/digital-review/your-meeting-for-status-change-hey-are-going-to-review-the-digital-file/comment-page-1#comment-1072</link>
		<dc:creator>musicseawater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 01:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reviewsonvideo.net/digitalreviews/digital-review/your-meeting-for-status-change-hey-are-going-to-review-the-digital-file#comment-1072</guid>
		<description>Well, the first thing it means is that he has at least another 10 months or so here under legal status and that has to be worth something, right?

I would say that his chances look good, as long as he stays out of trouble and keeps working (he does have a job?), it seems like they want to give him some more time to prove himself. As long as he doesn&#039;t get into any trouble, it looks pretty good for him.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the first thing it means is that he has at least another 10 months or so here under legal status and that has to be worth something, right?</p>
<p>I would say that his chances look good, as long as he stays out of trouble and keeps working (he does have a job?), it seems like they want to give him some more time to prove himself. As long as he doesn&#8217;t get into any trouble, it looks pretty good for him.<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.reviewsonvideo.net/digitalreviews/digital-review/your-meeting-for-status-change-hey-are-going-to-review-the-digital-file/comment-page-1#comment-1071</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 01:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reviewsonvideo.net/digitalreviews/digital-review/your-meeting-for-status-change-hey-are-going-to-review-the-digital-file#comment-1071</guid>
		<description>1888&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1888<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
